New yardsticks needed to create new ideas

Comments (1) Blog

By Charlie Litton, UNeMed | May 19, 2014

Imagine drawing up plans for the Empire State Building before anyone ever thought to invent structural steel or something that resembles an elevator.

It’s almost nonsensical.Phillips screw head and driver

There are ideas so groundbreaking that there aren’t even good ways to measure or test them. Or sometimes the tools that could make them work don’t even exist, like a Phillips head screw without its driver. The inventor often has to build a better yardstick and create new tools before they can even start working on the actual big idea.

Think about that for a minute.

Try inventing something when there is nothing in the known world that can prove the invention works.

The inventor must innovate to innovate.

In biomedical research, it sometimes requires that researchers essentially invent a new animal, like Anna, an adorably scruffy mutt famously engineered by researchers at Johns Hopkins in pursuit of an effective treatment for blue baby syndrome.

Researchers at UNMC don’t have a portrait of a loveable dog gracing any prominent walls like Anna does at the Johns Hopkins library. But we might one day see in rich oil paints the swirling hues of a sheep that helped improve kidney dialysis.

One way to improve dialysis is not with the machines that scrub blood of toxins normally removed by healthy kidneys. Rather, by improving the point of entry and exit as the machine pumps the dirty blood out and cleaned blood back in.

Currently, the best point of entry involves creating a portal, or fistula, between an artery and vein in the patient’s arm, usually in the wrist. Called an arteriovenous or AV fistula, the procedure is a medical marvel that significantly lowers the risk of death and improves the quality of life for people with failing kidneys. Like a wall socket provides regular access to a home’s electrical system, the AV fistula provides quick and easy access to the human vascular system.

And like any modern marvel, AV fistulas are a complex and imperfect solution, even when performed by an expert team of surgeons and support staff. In the best circumstances, they are difficult to create, fail in half of the patients who need them most, and almost always develop complications at one point or another.

A better, more reliable way to create AV fistulas seems like a good idea.

We have a surgeon here who thinks he has one. He worked it out, submitted his plan, and we’ve even had a few companies raise an eyebrow or two.

This is where I usually get a little excited.

But the old warhorses that have been around the block a few times tell me that I need to stow the pompoms and dial back the cheerleading.

The problem is understandable. When it comes time to show that an improvement like a new AV fistula could work, a researcher must first prove that it works on living tissue. The bigger problem is that no one in the world, as far as we know, has ever made an AV fistula work in anything other than a human. There just is no good analog to the human vascular system.

So the people with the development money in their back pocket tell us: “Yeah, looks great kid. But show me that it works in an animal model before I cut you a check.”

That’s setting the bar a little high.

It’s like saying, “You want to launch satellites into low-earth orbit? Sure, just land a probe on Ganymede first. Then we’ll talk.”

Jupiter's largest moon, GanymedeBefore our guy could even begin designing a better AV fistula procedure, he needed to invent a way to test it, which would involve the world’s first successful AV fistula on something other than a human.

But that is a story for another time.

For now, the larger point is that innovation takes more than just a great idea. An idea doesn’t even pack the suitcase for the long journey of development.

The idea seems to be the easy part.

The taller task is proving that the idea can work, a far more complex chore than merely collecting data. Failing that, an idea or a concept is just something to put on a shelf.

But the right test or tool that proves an idea can work? That’s something you hang from a wall.

 

Read article

Innovate to Innovate: A new breed of dog needed for blue babies

Comments (2) Blog

by Joe Runge, UNeMed | May 8, 2014

Anna

Anna

Babies born with congenital heart defects rarely survived childhood. Today, 85 percent of babies born with congenital heart defects survive to adulthood. That happened because surgeons learned how to reconstruct a baby’s heart through a series of unimaginably complex surgical procedures.

How those surgical procedures came to be is more complex than the surgery itself. The miracles produced in a few hundred years of modern science embolden audacious questions:

  • Can we reprogram a patient’s cells to attack his tumor?
  • Can we assess an individual patient’s risk for disease by looking at her DNA?
  • Can we reconstruct a baby’s defective heart?

What emboldens the question is the possibility of answer. The currency of innovation is the new and powerful ways that researchers can test their ideas but the most innovative questions are the most challenging to test. If no one has ever thought to ask the question then there is likely no known way to test it.

Medical researchers not only invent a new way to treat a disease but also a new a way to find out if it works. Before you can innovate, you have to innovate.

For example, a team from Johns Hopkins invented one of the first procedures to alleviate congenital heart defects in the 1940’s. The procedure bypasses the baby’s beating heart by cutting major arteries and reconnecting them to major veins.

To learn how to do the procedure, the team invented a way to surgically create congenital heart defects in dogs. Then they invented a way to surgically relieve the defect. It took years and hundreds of failures.

The first dog in which the team successfully created and then treated the defect was named Anna. Her portrait hangs at library at Johns Hopkins—an honor usually reserved for the human faculty.

The currency of innovation is the impossibly elusive data needed to actually answer the question. To reconstruct the baby’s heart first you must reconstruct a dog’s heart. To reconstruct the dog’s heart, you must first create an accurate model of the baby’s defect that you seek to correct.

To even ask the audacious question you need access to the problem, expert knowledge to understand it, and a creative approach to treat it. To answer your question you need the tools to test your idea. The more audacious the question, the more innovation is needed to bring about the answer.

That answer may require a genetically modified mouse that is susceptible to human tumors; it may be a national database of DNA sequences from thousands of patients with a disease; or it may be a little dog named Anna, and her improbable creation.

Read article

UNMC, UNL make history by testing mini-robots in ‘space’

Comments (0) News

by Vicky Cerino, UNMC

HOUSTON (May 5, 2014)—For more than 10 years, inventors at the University of Nebraska Medical Center and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln have spent countless hours building, testing, perfecting and patenting miniature surgical robots.

The robots were developed for National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) with the hope that flight surgeons can one day perform emergency surgery in space.

The next step called for testing the mini-robots in a simulated space environment.

This was accomplished in late April when Anton Simorov, M.D., UNMC surgery fellow, and UNL engineering students, Kearney Lackas, Walter Bircher and Tom Frederick, donned flight suits and took off from Johnson Space Center in Houston.

During two parabolic flights, the UNMC-UNL experienced 80 parabolic maneuvers that create a weightless environment in a modified 727 jet. The jet, at 24,000 feet, climbed 45 degrees to 34,000 feet. The pilots then perform a “push over” maneuver to create zero gravity or weightlessness for 20-30 seconds.

Dr. Simorov practiced surgical techniques — grasping, pulling, and cutting — during the weightless time periods, while engineering students monitored equipment.

“We accomplished our experiment goals. We collected a lot of data which will take several weeks to process and analyze,” Dr. Simorov said. “This will allow us to further our experiments. It was a great, unforgettable experience.”

The flight was the result of a 2013 visit by NASA officials to learn about university research with potential applications in space, said Marsha Morien, executive director of the UNMC Center for Advanced Surgical Technology. “The NASA visitors saw the project and said it was ready for flight testing,” Morien said. “Getting this flight is amazing. It’s highly competitive.”

Dmitry Oleynikov, M.D., a co-inventor of the mini-robots, said the flight was a big step.

“We’re very excited. We’ve always felt it was a good idea to take a surgical platform, miniaturize it and use it in places you can’t have a hospital,” said Dr. Oleynikov, director of the Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery and the Center for Advanced Surgical Technology at UNMC. “It’s a natural extension of that concept to use it in space, on the battlefield and in other remote areas.”

Shane Farritor, Ph.D., UNL professor of mechanical and materials engineering, said the flight represents a key milestone in the surgical robot program. “It was a great learning experience for the students to successfully deploy a complex field system and operate it in a unique environment,” said Dr. Farritor, co-inventor of the mini-robots. “It really moved the research forward. We have more to do, but I really like where we are.”

Through world-class research and patient care, UNMC generates breakthroughs that make life better for people throughout Nebraska and beyond. Its education programs train more health professionals than any other institution in the state. Learn more at unmc.edu and follow us on social media.

Read article

Biopharmaceutical symposium is June 5-6

Comments (0) News

OMAHA, Neb. (May 7, 2014)—In a step to improve dialogue, research collaboration and student learning objectives, UNMC’s College of Pharmacy is sponsoring a Biopharmaceutical Research and Development Symposium in June that will bring together leading academic researchers with biopharmaceutical industry scientists for two days of seminars, round-table discussions and networking opportunities.

Planned topics of discussion include the drug development and approval process, redefining the interface between industry and academia, enabling oral drug delivery technologies and new modalities in biopharma. Guest speakers include representatives from Novartis, Bristol-Meyers-Squibb, Merck, Biogen, Abbott Labs, Gilead Sciences, Bend Research, Celerion Corporation and Genzyme Corporation.

The symposium is free to all UNMC faculty and students, and registration for non-UNMC attendees is $150, which includes a lunch and snack on both days.

The symposium is planned for June 5-6 at the Michael F. Sorrell Center on 42nd and Emile Streets.

To register or view a complete list of events, times and speakers, visit https://www.unmc.edu/pharmacy/brds.htm.

Read article

Make Nebraska No. 1, vote UNeMed in ‘Buzz of BIO’

Comments (0) Blog, News

OMAHA, Neb. (April 15, 2014)—Help UNeMed put Nebraska’s biomedical innovation community at center stage of the world’s largest biotech conference by voting for UNeMed in the “Buzz of BIO” competition.

BuzzofBIOLogoVisit https://convention.bio.org/buzzofbio/voting.aspx and select UNeMed in the “Technologies of Tomorrow” category (companies are listed alphabetically). Anyone can vote, so spread the word and vote UNeMed to help put Nebraska on the map. Voting for UNeMed is a unique opportunity to promote UNMC technologies to potential partners and investors around the globe.

Voting closes April 22.

UNeMed is participating in the Buzz of BIO for the 2014 BIO International Convention (BIO), the world’s premiere biotechnology convention, which will be held this year on June 23-26 in San Diego, Calif.

Read article

Dixon testifies for University of Nebraska at House committee

Comments (0) News

WASHINGTON, D.C. (April 9, 2014)—Testifying before the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade Tuesday morning, UNeMed Corporation President and CEO Michael Dixon urged lawmakers to consider the potential impact to academic research commercialization efforts before drafting legislation aimed at stopping patent assertion entities.

Nebraska U.S. Rep. Lee Terry (left) chats with UNeMed President and CEO Michael Dixon following a Commerce, Trade and Manufacturing Subcommittee hearing April 8, 2014. Dixon testified for the committee hearing which is chaired by Terry.

Nebraska U.S. Rep. Lee Terry (left) chats with UNeMed President and CEO Michael Dixon following a Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade Subcommittee hearing April 8, 2014. Dixon testified for the committee hearing, which is chaired by Terry.

“Any action must preserve patent rights,” Dixon told the committee, which is chaired by Nebraska U.S. Rep. Lee Terry.

Terry called the hearing to examine the issue of patent demand letters, a common practice abused by some patent assertion entities, or PAEs. Everyone who spoke during the hearing unanimously decried the deceptive practice, citing as the principle problems: The general lack of clear details in demand letters, a lack of federal guidelines and no clear definition of local or state jurisdiction.

Terry said he and the committee wanted to hear from expert witnesses as the committee contemplates drafting a bill that would “itemize or prescribe what should be in a demand letter.”

Unscrupulous PAEs, commonly called “patent trolls,” build a stockpile of patents by purchasing them from inventors and other intellectual property owners. The patent trolls then pursue claims of infringement against all manner of businesses, often targeting small or new businesses because they are too scared, too inexperienced or just can’t afford to defend themselves.

Removing the vague demand letter from their toolbox would be a major blow to patent trolls, said Dixon, president at UNeMed, the technology commercialization office for the University of Nebraska Medical Center.

“Reduce the ambiguity of demand letters,” Dixon said, “and you’ll reduce the power of patent trolls.”

Sent by the thousands to small businesses, vague demand letters threaten legal action for patent infringement. The letters often do not refer to a specific patent or even how the business infringed a patent, which leads some businesses to pay for a license just to avoid the greater expense of lawyer fees.

“This bottom-feeder model is premised on the idea that they don’t have to be specific,” said Jason Schultz, an associate professor of clinical law at New York University who also testified before the committee. “…just pay to get it out of the way, which so many are doing.”

Read article

Legislature passes, governor signs Business Innovation Act extension

Comments (0) News

LINCOLN, Neb. (April 7, 2014)—The sunset on Nebraska’s Business Innovation Act was extended five years following a unanimous 44-0 vote on LB 1114 in the state legislature on March 27.

Gov. Dave Heineman signed the bill into law on Wednesday, April 2.

Co-sponsored by Heath Mello of Omaha and Galen Hadley of Kearney, LB 1114 extends the Business Innovation act from its original expiration date by five years to Dec. 1, 2021.

First passed in 2011, the Business Innovation Act created a mechanism for the state to provide funding and assistance to small or new Nebraska companies that need financial help with critical research or with building expensive prototypes.

The extension includes a provision for creating a fund to study best practices and research other methods to “support and increase venture capital in Nebraska.” The measure also earmarks $50,000 to create a “High Growth Business Development Cash Fund” to pay for the commissioned study.

Earlier this year, Michael Dixon, the president and CEO at UNeMed, testified in support of the bill before the Appropriations Committee on Feb. 19.  Mello, LB 1114’s co-sponsor, also chairs the committee.

The legislature also passed—and the governor signed—the companion appropriations bill, LB 1114A, which funds the mandated study.

Five members were listed as absent, and did not vote on LB 1114. They were Sens. Ernie Chambers of Omaha, Al Davis of Cherry County, John Harms of Scottsbluff, Charlie Janssen of Fremont, and Scott Latenbaugh of Omaha.

Read article

Dixon to testify before House subcommittee

Comments (0) News

WASHINGTON, D.C. (April 4, 2014)—Michael Dixon, president and CEO of UNeMed Corporation, is scheduled to testify on behalf of the University of Nebraska before a congressional committee next week in Washington D.C.

MikeDixon, who oversees intellectual property commercialization efforts for research developed at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, was invited to provide testimony to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade by U.S. Rep. Lee Terry of Nebraska, the subcommittee chairman.

The hearing, “Trolling for a Solution: Ending Abusive Patent Demand Letters,” is scheduled for Tuesday, April 8, at 9 a.m. The committee is expected to discuss the practice of so-called “patent trolls,” which are often accused of targeting small businesses with patent demand letters that threaten financial or legal action.

Dixon’s testimony is expected to address the merits of university research and commercialization efforts, and the potential impact that new legislation may have.

Additional information about the hearing, including video coverage, will be available through the committee website. C-Span coverage of the hearing has not yet been determined.

Read article

Schmidt passes patent bar, headed for USPTO and Notre Dame

Comments (0) News

OMAHA, Neb. (March 31, 2014)—UNeMed intern Jeff Schmidt, recently passed the patent bar exam, clearing a path toward a promising career as a patent attorney.

Jeff Schmidt, Ph.D.As an intern at UNeMed, Schmidt helped the licensing team evaluate new inventions, performed patent searches, and researched the patentability of some inventions. That experience played a crucial role in his future plans, including applying to a highly selective internship program with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in Alexandria, Va.
Schmidt was accepted into the program and will begin there in June.

“Without UNeMed, I don’t think I would have got that opportunity,” Schmidt said. “They like to see applicants who have patentability research experience, and understand the things that factor into intellectual property in general.”

Schmidt, 28, started working as an intern at UNeMed in May 2013, shortly after completing his doctorate in cancer research at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. In August he completed his MBA from the University of Nebraska at Omaha. Schmidt, from Belle Plaine, Minn., also holds a bachelor’s degree in biology from St. John’s University in Collegeville, Minn.

After he completes the two-month program at the USPTO, Schmidt plans to attend law school at Notre Dame when the fall semester begins in August.

Read article

Third annual Midwest Entrepreneurship Conference is April 4-5

Comments (0) News

MWEC_logoOMAHA, Neb. (Feb. 26, 2014)—University of Nebraska Medical Center students will receive a special discount to attend the third annual Midwest Entrepreneurship Conference, a University of Nebraska at Omaha event aimed at aspiring entrepreneurs and young professionals. The conference is designed to inform, support and inspire college students to be entrepreneurial, drive innovation and seek opportunity through enterprise creation.

The event will feature several prominent young entrepreneurs from around the country, including planned keynote speaker Mike Schultz, co-founder and co-president of RAIN Group.

Hosted by the UNO Collegiate Entrepreneurs’ Organization and the Center for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Franchising, the Midwest Entrepreneurship Conference will be April 4-5 at the Kaneko in the Old Market area of downtown Omaha.

Schultz, the author of “Rainmaking Conversations,” is expected to discuss how he successfully launched his new venture and what it takes to sell. His talk is sponsored by the Nebraska chapter of the Entrepreneurs’ Organization.

Student tickets are $59. General admission is $119, or $99 if purchased on or before March 15. Friday only tickets are $30.

Register at EventBrite.com or find more information at MWEComaha.com.

Read article

Committee hears support for Business Innovation Act extension, tags as ‘priority bill’

Comments (1) News

by Charlie Litton, UNeMed

LINCOLN, Neb. (Feb. 20, 2014)—After hearing roundly positive support for a bill that would extend the sunset on the Business Innovation Act Wednesday afternoon, the Nebraska Legislature Appropriations Committee returned the next morning and marked the bill, LB 1114, as “priority” legislation—increasing the chances it will see a final vote before the current legislative session closes in April.

Co-sponsored by appropriations committee chairman Heath Mello of Omaha and Galen Hadley of Kearney, LB 1114 extends the Business Innovation Act from its original expiration date by five years, to Dec. 1, 2021.

Nebraska State Senator Kate Bolz

Appropriations committee member Senator Kate Bolz of Lincoln discusses LB1114 during testimony on Feb. 19. The committee later designated LB1114—an extension of the Business Innovation Act—as a “priority bill.” Photo: Charlie Litton

Passed in 2011, the Business Innovation Act created a mechanism for the state to provide funding and assistance to small or new Nebraska companies that need financial help with critical research or with building expensive prototypes.

Seven prominent business leaders and entrepreneurs—from as far as Texas and California—testified in support of the bill at the Feb. 19 committee meeting, including Michael Dixon, president and CEO of UNeMed Corporation, the technology transfer office for the University of Nebraska Medical Center.

“I think this program is absolutely a leg up,” Dixon told the committee, “or at least puts us on the same footing as other states with a similar program.”

No one testified in opposition to the bill.

Several proponents noted that Nebraska has ranked at or near the bottom when measured against other states’ entrepreneurial and venture capital environments. But that has begun to change since implementation of the Business Innovation Act.

“Nebraska is starting to show up in top 10 lists,” said Dixon, who also sits on the Board of Directors for Invest Nebraska—a funding program in the Nebraska Department of Economic Development aimed at encouraging small businesses, innovation and entrepreneurship.

Thanks to the Business Innovation Act, Nebraska is on the verge of an “entrepreneurial renaissance,” Dixon said.

Extending the end date on the Business Innovation Act would give it a better chance to realize its full potential, Sen. Mello said during his opening remarks.

“Venture capital is an area where more long-term planning would be critical,” Mello said.

The extension includes a provision for creating a fund to study best practices and research other methods to “support and increase venture capital in Nebraska.” The bill also earmarks $50,000 to create a “High Growth Business Development Cash Fund” to be used to pay for the commissioned study, which will be due at the end of the year on Dec. 1.

Only one committee member appeared to challenge the merits of the bill. District 2 Senator Bill Kintner of Papillion questioned why taxpayers should essentially “subsidize” small business ventures.

The benefits, according to those who commented, centered on increasing job and economic growth in the state while attracting additional investment from outside Nebraska.

“The hardest money to raise is that first money,” said Bruce Lichorowic, CEO of Trak Surgical. Lichorowic is a self-described “serial entrepreneur” based in San Jose, Calif., who has raised more than $500 million in venture capital for more than 20 startup companies in a career that spans 30 years.

His latest venture, Trak Surgical in Omaha, is a new surgical tool company based on technology developed at the University of Nebraska Medical Center.

“I wish California had a program like this. It does not,” Lichorowic said. “This early stage money is really, really important. It got me here.”

Joseph Knecht, managing director at VentureTech in Lincoln, also supported LB1114. The New York native said he would not be in Nebraska if not for the Business Innovation Act.

Kintner, the senator from Papillion, asked Knecht: “Is there a downside to this program? There’s got to be a downside.”

“The only risk is not doing it,” Knecht said.

Corrective amended, Feb. 24, 2014: Spelling of Sen. Bill Kintner was incorrect.

Read article

Inflammation: The problem with heart disease and what we can do

Comments Off on Inflammation: The problem with heart disease and what we can do Blog

Originally appeared in the Feb. 2014 edition of Prairie Fire

By Daniel R. Anderson, M.D., Ph.D., University of Nebraska Medical Center

When I talk to my patients about their heart disease, we’re really talking about inflammation.

Research has well-established in recent decades the role inflammation plays in the development of plaques in the arteries or atherosclerotic disease. Inflammation is the steady drumbeat of a slow march toward heart disease that may not present any problems or even symptoms until a life-threatening heart attack or debilitating stroke.

Dr. Dan Anderson

Dr. Anderson

Unfortunately, I don’t meet many of my patients until after one of those major events, and I’m confident every other cardiologist in the world can say the same thing.

Heart disease is called the silent killer for a good reason, and much of cardiology today is about managing symptoms and mitigating risk factors. By the time a cardiologist or physician is brought into the equation, much of the damage has already been done.

If we look at heart disease as links in a chain—with a heart attack or stroke as the final link—then inflammation is one of the first links.

Eliminate inflammation, and we end heart disease, right?

Probably not, even if that was remotely possible.

But we could definitely knock it off its perch as the world’s top killer. We might be able to help those people living with the silent killer and don’t even know it—like the 52-year-old who has all the outward appearances of health and vitality, but then suddenly drops dead without warning or symptoms.

The first links in the chain are the numerous injuries that cause inflammation, which in turn plays a critical role in the build-up of plaques in our arteries.

In fact, all three stages of plaque development—initiation, growth and rupture with stroke or heart attack as a final event—could be a result of inflammation from injured arteries. Injuries that promote atherosclerosis include smoking, high blood pressure, diabetes, and high LDL or “bad” cholesterol.

Swag

Atherosclerosis (infohealthz.org)

These risk factors cause a number of responses that result in the production of molecules and mediators that cause inflammation in the artery walls. Meanwhile, in the course of a lifetime, the smooth muscle cells and immune cells within the artery walls take up cholesterol and other proteins in the blood.

That uptake is believed to be a key player in the buildup of the fatty streak in our arteries while we are still very young—perhaps as early as our teens or even younger.

As the insults and injuries pile up in our lifetimes, immune cells are attracted to the growing atherosclerotic plaque in our arteries. One particular bad player is the “bad” cholesterol, which is the prime suspect in the death of smooth muscle cells and the breakdown in tissue that holds arteries together.

As the plaque builds up and artery walls weaken, a rupture is nearly inevitable. The rupture exposes the plaque contents to our blood’s clotting cells, which in turn attach to the plaque resulting in a thrombus that blocks blood flow. This is the heart attack we all fear.

The ultimate result can be a fatal heart attack while you’re blowing out the candles on your 52nd birthday cake. For others, it might happen at 62 or 72 or 82.

All of this is just part of being human. It was true 10,000 years ago, is true today, and will probably continue to be true for generations to come.

That inevitability, however, doesn’t mean we should all just give in and take up smoking or join the bacon-of-the-month club.

Life is full of risks. Knowing these risks—and taking the right precautions—is part of why we live more than twice as long as Americans did just 100 years ago.

Simple blood test may determine future heart risk in artery disease

While searching for evidence that might add insight into inflammatory conditions such as alcoholic liver disease and arthritis, researchers at the University of Nebraska Medical Center and the Omaha VA Medical Center made a remarkable discovery.

Dr. Geoffrey Thiele, a professor of internal medicine, and Michael Duryee, a research coordinator for the Division Rheumatology and Immunology at UNMC’s College of Medicine, examined a natural molecule known as MAA or malondialdehyde–acetaldehyde. MAA builds up in a person’s blood as a result of inflammation, and as the research team discovered, it also indicates the presence of coronary artery disease.

Dr. ThieleMichael Duryee

Thiele and Duryee—along with cardiologist and researcher Daniel Anderson, M.D., Ph.D.—tested blood samples from hundreds of volunteers in two separate pilot studies. Both studies found a clear correlation between MAA and coronary artery disease, which often leads to heart disease, the world’s leading killer.The team is currently developing the discovery into an inexpensive and simple blood test that could more accurately predict a person’s risk of cardiac events like heart attack or stroke.

If successful, the test could better arm physicians worldwide with years, if not decades, of advance warning against a patient’s risk of heart attack, enabling earlier and more effective preventative care.

We now understand that not only is inflammation a central aspect of plaque and coronary artery disease, but the type of inflammation plays a critical role in how heart disease progresses. Even better, the type of inflammation might tell us what type of cardiac event might occur in the future.

So, a cardiovascular event such as suffering a heart attack and dying at 52-years-old; or chest pain at age 65, which requires artery bypass surgery; or a stroke at age 75 may depend on the specific type of inflammation which likely has been present for decades.

Yes, decades.

Several sobering studies show that 70 percent of 30-year-olds already have plaques and atherosclerotic disease.

Predicting if and how this atherosclerotic disease progresses as we age is the challenge. Right now, we are not very good at predicting who will “drop dead from a heart attack” at the age of 52 or who will live with atherosclerotic disease into old age with or without problems.

There are a number of ways to measure inflammation, however.

Several blood tests determine if you have a risk for a cardiovascular event by measuring blood levels of inflammatory molecules, including the high sensitivity C-reactive protein test, or hs-CRP for short. One of the most widely available tests, hs-CRP determines if you have an elevated risk of a cardiovascular event.

But there’s nothing out there that can accurately gauge the risk for a 30- or 40-year-old long before any of the trouble arises. Recognition of the problem at the time of a heart attack is a really a failure of medicine.

If 70 percent of adults have atherosclerotic disease by the third decade, we need to be talking about how to prevent the death at age 52. We are good at predicting risk in young adults, and we’re getting better at it. However, we miss almost 20 percent of adults who have disease because every test tells us all is well. Then the event or heart attack occurs.

Why are we missing these people?

The answer is unclear, but it may be in part due to inflammation. Until we better understand inflammation, we can’t effectively predict events in some individuals, regardless of their age.

Sadly, most cardiac patients don’t even know they have a problem until they’re recovering from a heart attack or stroke. Most troubling are those who have the first event that turns out to be fatal.

Working with Geoffrey M. Thiele, Ph.D., and Michael J. Duryee, M.S., at UNMC, we have found a new biomarker for inflammation, and we’re optimistic about its ability to accurately predict cardiac events. But we still have years of work before that test becomes a reality.

In the meantime, we all should be wise about our risks for a cardiovascular event:

  • Treat high blood pressure and high cholesterol
  • Never smoke
  • Treat diabetes with weight loss and, if necessary, medications
  • Follow an exercise regimen
  • Eat a healthy diet

As always, the goal for all this is to avoid the worst-case scenario: “Dead at 52.”

We also know that inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis result in systemic inflammation, and local infections like gingivitis, prostatitis, bronchitis, urinary tract infections and gastric inflammation are associated with plaque formation and atherosclerosis. These inflammatory diseases also accelerate plaque development, atherosclerotic disease and cause cardiovascular events earlier in life.

Being aware and treating these issues will serve you well.

The risk is real.  You know what to do.

Treat your known medical problems.

Don’t smoke, lose the weight, eat right and exercise.

If you do all these things, your inflammation will decrease, and your risk of a cardiovascular event will also decrease or be delayed by years.

Hopefully you don’t have an event until you are 62 or 72 or better yet, not at all.  That is unquestionably a real possibility, with aggressive treatment.

———

Daniel R. Anderson is a practicing cardiologist and basic science researcher at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Anderson received his medical degree from UNMC, and completed his doctorate in molecular and cellular immunopathology at UNMC. When he’s not treating patients, Anderson works with colleagues Geoff Thiele, Ph.D., and Michael Duryee on developing a better diagnostic test for cardiovascular inflammatory diseases.

UNeMed Corporation is the technology transfer office (TTO) for the University of Nebraska Medical Center. UNeMed serves researchers, faculty and staff who develop new biomedical technology and inventions, and strives to help bring those innovations to the marketplace for a healthier and better world.

Read article

Drug discovery seminar held at UNMC

Comments Off on Drug discovery seminar held at UNMC News

OMAHA, Neb. (Jan. 30, 2014)—UNeMed Corporation’s educational outreach program, the Innovation Seminar Series, continued Thursday afternoon with a talk from Deven Dandekar, Ph.D., at the University of Nebraska Medical Center’s Durham Research Center.

Dandekar, the director of toxicology at Xenometrics, L.L.C., delivered “Drug Development Strategies, from Discovery to the Clinic” to a standing-room only crowd of 50.

He outlined the meticulous steps needed to make the best selection possible for drug candidates. He then discussed the best practices of early-stage testing that can lead to a more efficient path to FDA approval.

Deven Dandekar, Ph.D.

Deven Dandekar, Ph.D., the director of toxicology at Xenometrics, addresses a gathering of 50 researchers, faculty and students during a recent seminar about drug development. (UNeMed Photo)

One point of emphasis was to think like a regulator when designing tests.

“It’s good to put your regulator hat on, and say ‘What do we need in the end,'” Dandekar said.

A copy of the presentation slideshow is available for UNMC faculty, staff and students. Contact Matt Boehm at UNeMed for details.

Late in the presentation, Matthew Frick, Xenometrics’ director of business development, reminded the assembled group of researchers, faculty and students that drug research is a “business of failure.”

He estimated that the average timeline is about eight years from discovery to product launch, and can cost between $400 million and $800 million. For every 10,000 candidates, just 250 will make it to the preclinical stage and only 10 advance to proof-of-concept testing. Only one in 10,000 will become a product, Frick said.

Dandekar also illustrated the most common reasons for failure in clinical trials, including adverse effects to the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. Those failures could often be traced back to insufficient screening in early testing. A more thorough screening process in early stages can help diminish those risks of failure, he said.

It also helps to have a more open partnership with potential resources, such as external contract laboratories.

“Think of your contract lab as a collaborator,” Dandekar said. “If you think of them as a service provider and withhold information, it won’t work out.”

Xenometrics, L.L.C., is a contract research organization providing study services to the biotechnology, pharmaceutical, companion animal health, and industrial- and agro-chemical industries. Xenometrics’ study services include PK/ADME, general toxicology, safety pharmacology, and development and reproductive toxicology studies.

UNeMed is the technology transfer office for UNMC, serving researchers, faculty and staff who develop new biomedical technology and inventions. UNeMed strives to help bring those innovations to the marketplace for a healthier and better world.

Read article

UNMC research finds encouraging news for ovarian cancer sufferers

Comments (0) News

Combination treatment strategy shows promise in phase I clinical study

by Tom O’Connor, UNMC

OMAHA, Neb. (Jan. 22, 2014) — A new study by the University of Nebraska Medical Center and Roswell Park Cancer Institute shows that a combination treatment strategy may provide a new option for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

The study, published in Cancer Immunology Research, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, found clinical benefit for women who were treated with the drug decitabine prior to administration of chemotherapy and a cancer vaccine.

Adam Karpf, Ph.D.

Adam Karpf, Ph.D.

“We are encouraged by the results from the phase I clinical study and look forward to extending this concept to the phase II setting, where treatment efficacy is the principal end point,” said Adam Karpf, Ph.D., associate professor, Eppley Institute, and member, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, at UNMC.

Dr. Karpf was co-principal investigator on the study along with Kunle Odunsi, M.D., Ph.D., professor and chair of the department of gynecologic oncology and director of the Center for Immunotherapy at Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, N.Y.

The deadliest of gynecologic cancers, ovarian cancer is the 10th most common cancer among women and the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death among women.

A prerequisite for an individual’s immune system to recognize and attack a tumor is the presence of high levels of a protein not normally found in the patient’s healthy cells. Proteins with this profile are called tumor antigens and can be good targets for anticancer vaccines.

“Preclinical studies by our group have shown that a specific class of tumor antigens is regulated by DNA methylation,” Dr. Karpf said. “Based on this knowledge, we developed the new clinical regimen.”

The investigators conducted a phase I dose-escalation trial of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine, to which they recruited 12 women with epithelial ovarian cancer that had not responded to multiple lines of chemotherapy, with an estimated progression-free survival time of three months.

All patients received decitabine on day one, the chemotherapy drug doxorubicin on day eight, and the cancer vaccine on day 15.

In preclinical analysis reported as part of this study, the investigators established the best sequence of drug administration: decitabine was effective only when administered before chemotherapy, and it was ineffective if given after chemotherapy; vaccine administration was the last step.

Of the 10 patients evaluated for clinical response, five had stable disease for up to 7.8 months, and one had a partial response with disease remission that lasted 5.8 months.

The dose escalation data suggested that lower doses of decitabine are associated with improved clinical response using this regimen. The treatment was well tolerated, and adverse events included hematologic side effects that were clinically manageable.

“One of the most remarkable results in terms of immune responses was that we were able to evoke what is called ‘antigen spreading,’” Dr. Karpf said. “Although we immunized against a single target, we analyzed and found that we were able to induce immune responses against three other antigens, against which we did not immunize.”

Dr. Odunsi said, “Although clinical results were not a focus of this phase I trial, we saw evidence of clinical benefit in up to 60 percent of the patients with chemotherapy-resistant tumors. The combination of decitabine, chemotherapy and the cancer vaccine may have enabled this remarkable effect.”

Based on the encouraging findings of the Phase I trial, the investigators are planning a Phase II trial at UNMC and Roswell Park to specifically evaluate the clinical efficacy of this novel chemo-immunotherapy approach in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

For the original study, see Cancer Immunology Research 2014; 2:37-49. The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute, the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund, the Roswell Park Alliance Foundation, a Cancer Vaccine Collaborative Grant, the Anna Maria Kellen Clinical Investigator Award, and Eisai Pharmaceuticals. Drs. Karpf and Odunsi have declared no conflicts of interest.

Read article

Seminar on drug delivery research strategies planned

Comments (0) News

OMAHA, Neb. (Jan. 15, 2014)—Toxicologist Deven Dandekar, Ph.D., will deliver an hour-long presentation about drug development in an upcoming seminar hosted by UNeMed Corporation.

Dr. Dandekar, the director of toxicology at Xenometrics, LLC, in Stilwell, Kan., will present, “Drug Development Strategies, from Discovery to the Clinic” on Thursday, Jan. 30, in room 1005 at the Durham Research Center on the western edge of the University of Nebraska Medical Center campus.

Deven Dandekar, Ph.D.

Dr. Dandekar

The talk will begin at noon, and a complimentary lunch will be provided. Space is limited, so lunch and seating will be available on a first-come, first-serve basis.

View the seminar on UNMC’s event calendar here.

Dr. Dandekar has more than 15 years of experience in academic, agrochemical and pharmaceutical research and development. He earned his zoology doctorate from the Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, India.

On Jan. 30, Dr. Dandekar is expected to discuss several key points of drug research and development, including:

  • What are INDs and NDAs?
  • Small molecule drugs vs. large molecule or biologic drugs
  • Six-step plan for lead candidate selection
  • Types of IND-enabling nonclinical studies
  • Routes of administration
  • Primary causes of drug candidate failure in clinical trials
  • De-risking strategy: Cardiovascular and CNS screening, et.
  • Duration of toxicity studies required to support Phase I and II clinical trials
  • IND-enabling nonclinical study timelines, cost and planning

Xenometrics, L.L.C., is a contract research organization providing study services to the biotechnology, pharmaceutical, companion animal health, and industrial- and agro-chemical industries. Xenometrics’ study services include PK/ADME, general toxicology, safety pharmacology, and development and reproductive toxicology studies.

Read article

My First Year: What everyone should know about tech transfer offices

Comments Off on My First Year: What everyone should know about tech transfer offices Blog

By Charlie Litton, UNeMed | Jan. 14, 2014

Charlie LittonAs I reflect on my first year with UNeMed and the technology transfer industry, I’m reminded of the most recent Halloween.

It was around that time that my then 2-year-old daughter discovered the most amazing thing in her tiny life. As we walked through a grocery store—likely on our way to the find the eggs or milk or something equally mundane—she skidded to a halt.

Her relentless entreaty for a box of Lucky Charms abruptly ended.

Her jaw slacked. Her little mouth opened to speak, but no words could form.

Until she discovered the candy aisle at the supermarket, Madeleine Litton, 3, had no idea such a bounty of sweet happiness could exist.

Until she discovered the candy aisle at the supermarket, Madeleine Litton, 3, had no idea such a bounty of sweet happiness could exist.

As far as her eyes could see, there was her Nirvana. A seemingly endless row of glistening packages and cheery colored boxes. It was a row of happiness.

The candy aisle.

It towered over her petite, 38-inch frame. It surrounded her. So unattainable, yet all within a finger’s reach.

“Daddy,” she said in a whisper of deferential awe. “Look at the nummy-nummies.”

I had just witnessed a well and truly blown mind.

And I can’t help but wonder if my new colleagues witnessed a similar scene when I joined UNeMed 12 short months ago.

I’ve always been a sucker for a good “gee-whiz” story, and there’s plenty to go around in these parts. The University of Nebraska Medical Center has been building world-class research facilities at a Ramses-like clip, and the innovations have been spinning out at an equally prolific rate.

Honestly, I expected all that. I could take the cheap and easy route here, and just run down a quick list of 10 cool new gadgets and gizmos. Something like that might be worth a glance while your barista swirls a Bob Ross mountain-scape into the foam of your morning latte.

Photo by Mark

Photo by Mark

But what I didn’t expect, what totally knocked me off my feet, was the discovery of the hidden world that is technology transfer.

I knew about it in the abstract, sure, but the tangible reality of it was the honest surprise.

Specifically, I’ve noticed a general misconception that licensing university research is believed to be a license to print your own money.

I wonder if people who believe that think about a smoke filled room lit by a lone 60-watt bulb glaring from under a dusty and dented metal shade. It’s long shadows stretching into the dark, unlit corners. Under the yellow light, men with sinewy forearms wear green-tinted visors to hide their soulless eyes. They clench smoldering cigars with bared teeth while counting stacks of cash amid a mass pile of silver and gold.

The room reeks of sweat and children’s tears.

When it comes to the possible financial windfall that universities might enjoy from tech transfer offices, I honestly don’t know what I thought before I started here—or even if I thought about it at all.

But somewhere up there, I suppose I suspected that the industry would be a lucrative one. That UNeMed and UNMC—and, by extension, every other TTO in the land—were reaping a tidy little profit from royalties and licensing fees and the like.

I must have, because I know that I was entirely surprised to learn that assumption was and is false.

First, any profits are rolled right back into the research machine, and second I haven’t seen a whole lot of preoccupation with the bottom line in the first place.

But none of that really matters, because for the false premise to hold, it presumes that TTOs are money-grubbing beasts. That they are slaves to the almighty dollar, and pursue only what can make a buck.

In reality, TTOs are slaves to science. They want good science. Better science. The best, really.

And that’s where my jaw went a little slack.

I’m surrounded by Ph.D.’s who all know their way around a cryostat. They tell gene sequencing and pipette jokes for crying out loud. If I had a slightly larger brain, I might even get one or two of them. Who knows. They might even be funny, right?

Science Humor

Science Humor (xkcd)

I suppose if the university were honestly and truly interested in a revenue-generating machine, they wouldn’t stack the office with scientists. There might be a worse business plan, but I can’t imagine what that might be. Instead, if the administration was only interested in the Almighty Dollar, they might be better served to load us up with MBAs and save the coffee for closers.

So it’s not profit that drives this ship, it’s technology.

There’s a genuine excitement about a new discovery, and from that flows an earnest paternalism in trying to protect that discovery so it can reach its fullest potential.

It makes me happy and proud and excited to honestly say I get to work at place that is sincerely interested in helping make the world a healthier and better place.

If that weren’t true, I would have saved myself some time and just cranked out another list of technologies.

———

Charlie Litton is the communications associate for UNeMed Corporation, the technology transfer office (TTO) for the University of Nebraska Medical Center. UNeMed serves researchers, faculty and staff who develop new biomedical technology and inventions, and strives to help bring those innovations to the marketplace for a healthier and better world.

Read article